J. F. Allen, L. K. Schubert, G. Ferguson, P. Heeman, C. H. Hwang et al., The TRAINS project: a case study in building a conversational planning agent, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol.3, issue.1, pp.7-48, 1995.
DOI : 10.1145/152947.152954

N. Asher, Reference to Abstract Objects in English: a Philosophical Semantics for Natural Language Metaphysics, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Kluwer, 1993.

N. Asher and A. Lascarides, Questions in dialogue, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.21, issue.3, pp.237-309, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005364332007

N. Asher and A. Lascarides, Logics of Conversation, 2003.

N. Asher and A. Lascarides, Agreement, disputes and commitments in dialogue, Proceedings of SemDial 2012 (SeineDial), the 16th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, pp.31-40, 2012.

G. Aston and L. Barnard, The BNC handbook, 1998.

K. G. Bailey and F. Ferreira, The processing of filled pause disfluencies in the visual world, Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain, pp.485-500, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50024-0

A. Baltag, L. Moss, and S. Solecki, The Logic of Public Announcements, Common Knowledge, and Private Suspicions, Proceedings of the 7th conference on Theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge, pp.43-56, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_38

D. Barr, Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground, Cognition, vol.109, issue.1, pp.18-40, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.005

J. Barwise and J. Etchemendy, The Liar, 1987.

J. Barwise and J. Perry, Situations and Attitudes, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.78, issue.11, 1983.
DOI : 10.2307/2026578

C. Beyssade and J. Marandin, Commitment??: une attitude dialogique, Langue fran??aise, vol.162, issue.2, pp.89-108, 2009.
DOI : 10.3917/lf.162.0089

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00746390

M. Bratman, Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, pp.327-341, 1992.

S. Brennan and H. Clark, Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.22, issue.6, pp.1482-1493, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482

S. Brennan, A. Galati, and A. Kuhlen, Two Minds, One Dialog, Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol.53, pp.301-344, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S0079-7421(10)53008-1

S. E. Brennan and M. F. Schober, How Listeners Compensate for Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.44, issue.2, pp.274-296, 2001.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.2000.2753

S. Brown-schmidt, The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.72, issue.5, pp.893-900, 2009.
DOI : 10.3758/PBR.16.5.893

S. Brown-schmidt, C. Gunlogson, and M. Tanenhaus, Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation, Cognition, vol.107, issue.3, pp.1122-1134, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.005

J. Calder, E. Klein, and H. Zeevat, Unification Categorial Grammar, Proceedings of the 12th conference on Computational linguistics -, pp.83-86, 1988.
DOI : 10.3115/991635.991653

H. Cappelen and E. Lepore, Quotation, 2012.

L. Carlson, Dialogue Games, Synthese Language Library. D. Reidel, 1983.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-015-3963-0

C. Chelba, Statistical language modelling, Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language, 2010.

E. V. Clark, Children, Conversation, and Acquisition, Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics, 2012.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139029377.039

H. Clark, Using Language, 1996.

H. Clark and J. Foxtree, Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking, Cognition, vol.84, issue.1, pp.73-111, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3

H. Clark and R. Gerrig, Quotations as Demonstrations, Language, vol.66, issue.4, pp.764-805, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/414729

H. Clark and E. Schaefer, Contributing to Discourse, Cognitive Science, vol.8, issue.2, pp.259-294, 1989.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7

H. Clark and D. Wilkes-gibbs, Referring as a collaborative process, Arenas of Language Use, pp.107-143, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7

R. Cooper, Austinian Truth, Attitudes and Type Theory, Research on Language and Computation, vol.12, issue.6, pp.333-362, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11168-006-0002-z

R. Cooper, Type Theory and Semantics in Flux, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-0-444-51747-0.50009-3

R. Cooper and J. Ginzburg, Type theory with records for natural language semantics, Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 2013.

R. Cooper and M. Poesio, Situation theory. In Fracas Deliverable D8 . The Fracas Consortium, Centre for Cognitive Science, 1994.

R. Cooper and A. Ranta, Natural languages as collections of resources Language Variation, Change and Evolution, Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, 2008.

D. Davidson, A nice derangement of epitaphs. Philosophical grounds of rationality: Intentions, categories, ends, p.157, 1986.

D. Brabanter and P. , The Semantics and Pragmatics of Hybrid Quotations, Language and Linguistics Compass, vol.49, issue.2, pp.107-120, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00185.x

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00354797

J. De-ruiter, H. Mitterer, and N. Enfield, Projecting the End of a Speaker's Turn: A Cognitive Cornerstone of Conversation, Language, vol.82, issue.3, pp.515-535, 2006.
DOI : 10.1353/lan.2006.0130

P. Dekker, Optimal inquisitive discourse, Questions in Dynamic Semantics of Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, pp.83-102, 2006.

P. Dekker, Dynamic semantics The Handbook of Semantics, 2011.

D. Farkas and K. Bruce, On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions, Journal of Semantics, vol.27, issue.1, pp.81-118, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/ffp010

R. Fernández, Non-sentential utterances in dialogue, Proceedings of the 3rd SIGdial workshop on Discourse and dialogue -, 2006.
DOI : 10.3115/1118121.1118124

R. Fernández and J. Ginzburg, Non-sentential utterances, Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Computational linguistics -, pp.13-42, 2002.
DOI : 10.3115/1072228.1072363

R. Fernández, S. Larsson, R. Cooper, J. Ginzburg, and D. Schlangen, Reciprocal learning via dialogue interaction: Challenges and prospects, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2011 Workshop on Agents Learning Interactively from Human Teachers (ALIHT), 2011.

T. Fernando, Observing events and situations in time, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.31, issue.4, pp.527-550, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s10988-008-9026-1

C. Gardent and M. Kohlhase, Computing parallelism in discourse, IJCAI, pp.1016-1021, 1997.

J. Ginzburg, An update semantics for dialogue, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Semantics, 1994.

J. Ginzburg, Resolving questions, I, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.64, issue.5, pp.459-527, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00985365

J. Ginzburg, Resolving questions, II, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.64, issue.6, pp.567-609, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00983299

J. Ginzburg, Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue, Logic, Language, and Computation, pp.221-237, 1996.

J. Ginzburg, On some semantic consequences of turn taking, Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium on Formal Semantics and Logic, pp.145-150, 1997.

J. Ginzburg, Situation semantics: from indexicality to metacommunicative interaction The Handbook of Semantics, 2011.

J. Ginzburg, The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697922.001.0001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01138031

J. Ginzburg and R. Cooper, Clarification, Ellipsis, and the Nature of Contextual Updates in Dialogue, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.27, issue.3, pp.297-366, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:LING.0000023369.19306.90

J. Ginzburg and R. Cooper, Quotation via Dialogical Interaction, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, vol.33, issue.2, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s10849-014-9200-5

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01126614

J. Ginzburg and R. Fernández, Scaling up from dialogue to multilogue, Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics , ACL '05, pp.231-238, 2005.
DOI : 10.3115/1219840.1219869

J. Ginzburg and R. Fernández, Computational Models of Dialogue, Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language, 2010.
DOI : 10.1002/9781444324044.ch16

J. Ginzburg and S. Moradlou, The earliest utterances in dialogue: towards a formal theory of parent/child talk in interaction, Proceedings of SemDial 2013 (DialDam), 2013.

J. Ginzburg and M. Poesio, Grammar is a system that characterizes types of talk in interaction. Paris-Diderot and Essex Unpublished manuscript, 2014.

J. Ginzburg and I. A. Sag, Interrogative Investigations: the form, meaning and use of English Interrogatives. Number 123 in CSLI Lecture Notes, 2000.

J. Ginzburg, I. A. Sag, and M. Purver, Integrating conversational move types in the grammar of conversation, Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium, number 114 in Pragmatics and Beyond new series, pp.25-42, 2003.
DOI : 10.1075/pbns.114.03gin

J. Ginzburg, R. Fernández, and D. Schlangen, Disfluencies as intrautterance dialogue moves, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01126615

H. P. Grice, Studies in the Ways of Words, 1989.

J. Groenendijk, The logic of interrogation, Questions in Dynamic Semantics of Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, pp.43-62, 2006.

J. Groenendijk, Inquisitive Semantics: Two Possibilities for Disjunction, Proceedings of The Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language, and Computation, pp.80-94, 2007.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005364332007

J. Groenendijk and F. Roelofsen, Inquisitive Semantics and Pragmatics, Presented at the Stanford workshop on Language, Communication and Rational Agency, 2009.

J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics ofAnswers, 1984.

C. L. Hamblin, Fallacies, 1970.

R. Hausser and D. Zaefferer, Questions and Answers in a Context-Dependent Montague Grammar, Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages. Reidel, 1979.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-9775-2_12

P. Healey, M. Purver, J. King, J. Ginzburg, and G. Mills, Experimenting with clarification in dialogue, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp.539-544, 2003.

P. A. Heeman and J. F. Allen, Speech repairs, intonational phrases and discourse markers: Modeling speakers' utterances in spoken dialogue, Computational Linguistics, vol.25, issue.4, pp.527-571, 1999.

J. Henderson, O. Lemon, and K. Georgila, Hybrid Reinforcement/Supervised Learning of Dialogue Policies from Fixed Data Sets, Computational Linguistics, vol.16, issue.4, pp.487-511, 2008.
DOI : 10.1098/rsta.2000.0593

J. Jayez, Bon : le mot de la fin, 2004.

D. Kaplan, The meaning of ouch and oops: Explorations in the theory of meaning as use, 1999.

R. Kempson, W. Meyer-viol, and D. Gabbay, Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding, 2000.

B. Keysar, S. Lin, and D. Barr, Limits on theory of mind use in adults, Cognition, vol.89, issue.1, pp.25-41, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00064-7

S. Larsson, Issue based Dialogue Management, 2002.

S. Larsson and R. Cooper, Towards a formal view of corrective feedback, Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition, CACLA '09, 2009.
DOI : 10.3115/1572461.1572464

A. Lascarides and N. Asher, Agreement, Disputes and Commitments in Dialogue, Journal of Semantics, vol.26, issue.2, pp.109-158, 2009.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/ffn013

W. J. Levelt, Monitoring and self-repair in speech, Cognition, vol.14, issue.1, pp.41-104, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4

S. C. Levinson, Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature, 2000.

P. Lupkowski and J. Ginzburg, Question answers. Computational Linguistics (under review, 2014.

P. Lupkowski and A. Wi´sniewskiwi´sniewski, Turing interrogative games. Minds and Machines, pp.1-14, 2011.

S. Malamud and T. Stephenson, Three Ways to Avoid Commitments: Declarative Force Modifiers in the Conversational Scoreboard, Journal of Semantics, vol.32, issue.2, pp.74-83, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/ffu002

W. Mann and S. Thompson, Rhetorical structure theory: A framework for the analysis of texts, Cognitive Science Research Papers RS, pp.87-185, 1987.

E. Mccready, What man does, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.79, issue.1, pp.671-724, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10988-009-9052-7

C. Metzing and S. Brennan, When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.49, issue.2, pp.201-213, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00028-7

M. Moortgat, Categorial grammar, Handbook of Logic and Linguistics, 1997.

J. Morgan, Sentence fragments and the notion 'sentence, Issues in Linguistics: papers in honour of Henry and Rene Kahane, 1973.

G. Morrill, Incremental Processing and Acceptability, Computational Linguistics, vol.26, issue.3, pp.319-338, 2000.
DOI : 10.1002/malq.19810271306

P. Muller and L. Prevot, An empirical study of acknowledgement structures, Proceedings of DiaBruck, 2003.

R. Muskens, Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.12, issue.2, pp.143-186, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00635836

R. Muskens, Categorial grammar and lexical-functional grammar, Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference, pp.259-279, 2001.

Y. Nakano, G. Reinstein, T. Stocky, and J. Cassell, Towards a model of face-to-face grounding DARPA communicator travel reservation corpus evaluation, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics National Institute of Standards and Technology, pp.553-561, 2000.

N. Norrick, Interjections as pragmatic markers, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.41, issue.5, pp.866-891, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005

D. Novick and S. Sutton, An empirical model of acknowledgment for spoken-language systems, Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -, pp.96-101, 1994.
DOI : 10.3115/981732.981746

M. Poesio and H. Rieser, Completions, Coordination, and Alignment in Dialogue, Dialogue & Discourse, vol.1, issue.1, pp.1-89, 2010.
DOI : 10.5087/dad.2010.001

M. Poesio and H. Rieser, An Incremental Model of Anaphora and Reference Resolution Based on Resource Situations, Dialogue & Discourse, vol.2, issue.1, pp.235-277, 2011.
DOI : 10.5087/dad.2011.110

M. Poesio and D. Traum, Conversational Actions and Discourse Situations, Computational Intelligence, vol.13, issue.3, pp.309-347, 1997.
DOI : 10.1111/0824-7935.00042

C. Potts, The expressive dimension. Theoretical linguistics, pp.165-198, 2007.

M. Purver, CLARIE: Handling Clarification Requests in a Dialogue System, Research on Language and Computation, vol.9, issue.1, pp.259-288, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11168-006-9006-y

M. Purver, J. Ginzburg, and P. Healey, On the means for clarification in dialogue, Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue, pp.235-256, 2001.

M. Purver, P. G. Healey, J. King, J. Ginzburg, and G. J. Mills, Answering clarification questions, Proceedings of the 4th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, 2003.

M. Purver, J. Ginzburg, and P. Healey, Lexical categories and clarificational potential, 2006.

A. Ranta, Type Theoretical Grammar, 1994.

F. Recanati, Truth-Conditional Pragmatics, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00926114

H. Rieser, Pointing in dialogue, Proceedings of Catalog'04, The 8th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, 2004.

H. Rieser and M. Poesio, Interactive gesture in dialogue, Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference on The 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, SIGDIAL '09, pp.87-96, 2009.
DOI : 10.3115/1708376.1708388

H. Rieser and D. Schlangen, Special issue on incremental processing in dialogue, Dialogue and Discourse, 2011.

V. Rieser and J. Moore, Implications for generating clarification requests in task-oriented dialogues, Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics , ACL '05, 2005.
DOI : 10.3115/1219840.1219870

C. Roberts, Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Working Papers in Linguistics-Ohio State University Department of Linguistics, pp.91-136, 1996.

C. Roberts, Information structure: Afterword. Semantics and Prag- matics, 2011.

C. Roberts, Solving for interpretation, 2011.

K. Rodriguez and D. Schlangen, Form, intonation and function of clarification requests in german task-oriented spoken dialogues, Proceedings of Catalog'04, 2004.

J. Ross, Guess who?, Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.252-286, 1969.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645763.003.0002

H. Sacks, E. Schegloff, J. , and G. , A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language, vol.50, issue.4, pp.696-735, 1974.
DOI : 10.1353/lan.1974.0010

E. Schegloff, Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction, Linguistics, vol.25, issue.1, pp.201-218, 1987.
DOI : 10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.201

E. Schegloff, G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks, The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation, Language, vol.53, issue.2, pp.361-382, 1977.
DOI : 10.1353/lan.1977.0041

C. Schelfhout, P. Coppen, N. Oostdijk, and F. Van-der-slik, Interjections in dutch: a corpus-based approach, NEERLANDISTIEK. NL, vol.5, 2005.

D. Schlangen, A Coherence-Based Approach to the Interpretation of Non-Sentential Utterances in Dialogue, 2003.

J. Seligman and L. Moss, Situation Theory, Handbook of Logic and Linguistics, 1997.

E. E. Shriberg, Preliminaries to a theory of speech disfluencies, 1994.

D. Sperber and D. Wilson, Relevance. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. A second edition, 1986.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000101

M. Steedman, The Syntactic Process. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 1999.

A. Stent, Shared experiences, shared representations, and the implications for applied natural language processing, Proceedings of FLAIRS, 2011.

T. Stivers, N. Enfield, P. Brown, C. Englert, M. Hayashi et al., Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, p.10587, 2009.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.0903616106

J. Svartvik and R. Quirk, A Corpus of English Conversation, 1980.

S. Tagliamonte, Analysing sociolinguistic variation, 2006.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511801624

D. Traum, A Computational Theory of Grounding in Natural Language Conversations, 1994.

R. Tuomela, Cooperation: A philosophical study, 2000.

A. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence, pp.59-433, 1950.

D. Walton, Burden of proof in a modified hamblin dialogue system, Informal Logic, issue.4, p.31, 2011.

L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Citations from second edition, 1953.