Think slow, then fast: Does repeated deliberation boost correct intuitive responding? - Université Paris Cité Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Memory and Cognition Année : 2021

Think slow, then fast: Does repeated deliberation boost correct intuitive responding?

Résumé

Influential studies on human thinking with the popular two-response paradigm typically ask participants to continuously alternate between intuitive ("fast") and deliberate ("slow") responding. One concern is that repeated deliberation in these studies will artificially boost the intuitive, "fast" reasoning performance. A recent alternative two-block paradigm therefore advised to present all fast trials in one block before the slow trials were presented. Here we tested directly whether allowing people to repeatedly deliberate will boost their intuitive reasoning performance by manipulating the order of the fast and slow blocks. In each block participants solved variants of the bat-and-ball problem. Maximum response time in fast blocks was 4s and 25s in the slow blocks. One group solved the fast trials before the slow trials, a second group solved the slow trials first, and a third mixed group alternated between slow and fast trials. Results showed that the order factor did not affect accuracy on the fast trials. This indicates that repeated deliberation does not boost people's intuitive reasoning performance.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
main-Marine - HAL.pdf (428.62 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03169096 , version 1 (15-03-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Matthieu Raoelison, Marine Keime, Wim de Neys. Think slow, then fast: Does repeated deliberation boost correct intuitive responding?. Memory and Cognition, 2021, ⟨10.3758/s13421-021-01140-x⟩. ⟨hal-03169096⟩
18 Consultations
47 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More