Think slow, then fast: does repeated deliberation boost correct intuitive responding? - Université Paris Cité Access content directly
Conference Poster Year :

Think slow, then fast: does repeated deliberation boost correct intuitive responding?

Abstract

Controversial studies on human thinking with the popular two-response paradigm typically ask participants to continuously alternate between intuitive (“fast”) and deliberate (“slow”) responding. One concern is that repeated deliberation in these studies will artificially boost the intuitive, “fast” reasoning performance. A recent alternative two-block paradigm therefore advised to present all fast trials in one block before the slow trials were presented. Here we tested directly whether allowing people to repeatedly deliberate will boost their intuitive reasoning performance by manipulating the order of the fast and slow blocks, using variants of the bat-and-ball problem. One group solved the fast trials before the slow trials, a second group solved the slow trials first, and a third mixed group alternated between slow and fast trials. Results showed that the order factor did not affect accuracy on the fast trials. This indicates that repeated deliberation does not boost people’s intuitive reasoning performance.
Not file

Dates and versions

hal-04057152 , version 1 (03-04-2023)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-04057152 , version 1

Cite

Matthieu Raoelison, Marine Keime, Wim de Neys. Think slow, then fast: does repeated deliberation boost correct intuitive responding?. 61st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Nov 2020, Virtual conference, United States. ⟨hal-04057152⟩
13 View
0 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More