Who pays the costs of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation? - Université Toulouse 1 Capitole Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue American Journal of Agricultural Economics Année : 2009

Who pays the costs of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation?

Résumé

Our aim is to explore who pays the costs and who reaps the benefits of maintaining a dual-market system of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and non-GMOs. We analyze the welfare effects of the introduction of consumer “hatred” given GMO technology and the introduction of GMO technology given hatred. Making alternative assumptions of competitive and then monopolistic supply, we recognize that identity preservation (IP) of non-GMOs creates costs for IP and non-IP producers. We model these costs as depending on the sizes of the two supply channels.

Dates et versions

hal-02665027 , version 1 (31-05-2020)

Identifiants

Citer

Marion Desquilbet, David S. Bullock. Who pays the costs of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2009, 91 (1), pp.656-672. ⟨10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01262.x⟩. ⟨hal-02665027⟩
8 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More